It's the future, and mankind has been almost competely wiped out by the Sentinels, unstoppable killer robots. The surviving X-Men decide that their only option is to go back in time and prevent the Sentinels from ever becoming operational. There is one critical event that happened, and if they can prevent that from happening, it will completely change history and everything will be fine.
So they send Wolverine back to 1973. He enlists the help of the young Charles Xavier (James McAvoy), Magneto (Michael Fassbender), and Hank McCoy (Nicholas Hoult) to stop Mystique (Jennifer Lawrence) from killing someone. Along the way they enlist the help of Quicksilver (Even Peters), who steals the movie with only 10 minutes of screen time.
I had high expectations for this movie going in. I was a fan of X-Men (2000), and X2: X-Men United (2003) was not only a great superhero movie, but a great movie, period. I went back and re-watched both movies recently, and they hold up really well. Director Bryan Singer left the franchise to make Superman Returns, and Brett Ratner wound up making X-Men: The Last Stand (2006), which was a big disappointment. The two standalone Wolverine movies were decent, but 2011's X-Men: First Class was almost as good as X2. Now Bryan Singer has returned to the franchise he started.
What I liked:
- Quicksilver. He should have been in the entire movie. There's a sequence where he saves the others from being shot, and it's incredible. His power is he moves really fast, but we watch this scene unfold from his point of view. So while everyone around is moving in super slow motion, he's casually putting on his headphones and walking around the room, flicking bullets out of the air. That's one of the things I've been missing since X2 - seeing how much fun it would be to have these powers. As fun as the action sequences can be, it's nice to see them having fun with their power.
- Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen back as Professor X and Magneto. Even though they weren't in the movie much, it was nice to see them back in these roles. It isn't really explained how Professor X is back from the dead, or how Magneto has his powes again, even though the last scenes of X-Men: The Last Stand hinted that it was a possibility. But that's ok. Ian McKellen has a way of using his powers with the authority and dignity of a trained Shakespearing actor. There's something so cool about watching McKellen do these moves that we all probably did as kids.
- I like the way the movie focuses on the characters instead of action and spectacle. With the exception of the finale at the White House, there's very little distruction. But the dialogue is pretty good and the conflicts between the characters is dramatic. It helps that we know these characters so well.
What I didn't like:
- It seemed like the plan to go back in time to save humanity was thrown together really fast. It's like the older X-Men meet up with the younger ones, find out about time travel, and say "Hey, why don't we go back in time and stop all this?"
- Speaking of time travel, the whole concept didn't seem to hold up during the finale. If stopping one event would have significant effects on history, wouldn't everything else that happens also change history? In the original timeline, Magneto doesn't turn the Sentinels on the humans and he doesn't pick up that sports stadium. It seems like the stuff that happens would have altered history and it wouldn't matter when Mystique makes her choice. I guess that's the kind of thing you can't think about too much when time travel is used in a movie. No time travel movie is ever able to keep to the rules they establish.
- I got tired of Charles trying to talk Mystique out of what she was planning to do. He could have explained to her that if she goes through with it, the Sentinels would get more powerful and kill everyone. Instead he just keeps pleading with her, and saying "The girl I grew up with wouldn't kill anyone." It got annoying.
- They didn't give Hank McCoy much to do. I liked his character in First Class, but this time he just seemed like a distraction.
- Quicksilver wasn't in the movie enough. Even Peters played Quicksilver with a gleam in his eye and a wicked grin. His character was a breath of fresh air with all these other gloomy characters around, and his presence would have made the rest of the movie a lot more enjoyable. Also, he really could have helped out at the White House at the end.
Overall, I did enjoy the movie. But I had such high expectations and the movie didn't live up to them. I really thought that Bryan Singer would be able to make another movie on par with X2, or at least with First Class. I wish he would have stayed with the X-Men franchise all along instead of making Superman Returns. I can only imagine how much better the third movie would have been.
But I am pretty excited for the next movie. I don't want to spoil the end, but it sets things up nicely for more X-Men movies. Hopefully the next one will be even better.
Friday, May 23, 2014
Neighbors - 2 stars
Seth Rogen and Rose Byrne play a couple with a newborn baby. One day, a fraternity moves in next door. They're worried that the frat parties will go late into the night and wake up their baby. So they go next door to introduce themselves. To help cement the friendship, they bring some pot with them (cause it's a Seth Rogen movie). They get along at first, even going to a party at the frat house and having a great time (strangely, the baby doesn't wake up), but one night the frat house is partying late into the night. They call the cops on the frat, and now they're enemies.
There are a couple things going on with this movie. On the surface, it's just a bunch of dick jokes and frat boy humor. The neighbors start playing more and more elaborate pranks on each other - the funniest one involves the airbag from Rogen's car, which you probably saw in the trailer. But besides the jokes, the movie is also exploring what it's like to be in your 30s and responsible. The couple is only a few years removed from the college / party lifestyle, and you can tell how badly they want to fit in with these kids. But they also have a house and a kid, and are making the adjustment to responsible adult.
The problem is the movie doesn't explore this theme very well, and the jokes aren't that funny. Some are, but I spent way too much time in this movie not laughing. Zac Efron and Dave Franco play the leaders of the fraternity, and they aren't funny. There are several scenes of them together that feel improvised. The interesting thing about improvisation is that you sometimes have to try a lot of stuff that doesn't work before you find the stuff that does work.
A great example of this can be found on the DVD extras for The Break Up. There are outtakes of Vince Vaughn and Jon Favreau improvising a scene together, and it's interesting to watch their process. Most of what they say to each other isn't funny, but they keep working it until they come up with some funny stuff.
A good movie edits out the stuff that doesn't work. This movie leaves it in. There's a scene where Efron and Franco make up after a fight, and for several minutes they riff on "Bros before hoes." It goes on forever and isn't funny.
So, this is a misfire from Seth Rogen. It's too bad because this looked really funny, and it sounds like a funny concept. But all the funny parts were in the trailers and the movie kind of bored me.
There are a couple things going on with this movie. On the surface, it's just a bunch of dick jokes and frat boy humor. The neighbors start playing more and more elaborate pranks on each other - the funniest one involves the airbag from Rogen's car, which you probably saw in the trailer. But besides the jokes, the movie is also exploring what it's like to be in your 30s and responsible. The couple is only a few years removed from the college / party lifestyle, and you can tell how badly they want to fit in with these kids. But they also have a house and a kid, and are making the adjustment to responsible adult.
The problem is the movie doesn't explore this theme very well, and the jokes aren't that funny. Some are, but I spent way too much time in this movie not laughing. Zac Efron and Dave Franco play the leaders of the fraternity, and they aren't funny. There are several scenes of them together that feel improvised. The interesting thing about improvisation is that you sometimes have to try a lot of stuff that doesn't work before you find the stuff that does work.
A great example of this can be found on the DVD extras for The Break Up. There are outtakes of Vince Vaughn and Jon Favreau improvising a scene together, and it's interesting to watch their process. Most of what they say to each other isn't funny, but they keep working it until they come up with some funny stuff.
A good movie edits out the stuff that doesn't work. This movie leaves it in. There's a scene where Efron and Franco make up after a fight, and for several minutes they riff on "Bros before hoes." It goes on forever and isn't funny.
So, this is a misfire from Seth Rogen. It's too bad because this looked really funny, and it sounds like a funny concept. But all the funny parts were in the trailers and the movie kind of bored me.
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - 2 1/2 stars
It's difficult to review a new Spider-Man movie without comparing it to Sam Raimi's Spider-Man movies. I'm sure I said it two years ago when The Amazing Spider-Man came out, but it's way too soon to reboot the franchise. Sam Raimi's movies came out in 2002, 2004, and 2007, and it's ridiculous to reboot the franchise in 2012. They should have had Andrew Garfield take over the role and just made Spider-Man 4. We didn't need Peter Parker's origin story again.
In this new movie, Peter Parker (Garfield) can't decide what to do about Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone). He's in love with her, but he keep seeing the ghost of her dead father (Dennis Leary), who made him promise in the previous movie to stay away from Gwen. He tells her they can't be together, but then he stalks her and won't leave her alone. He's also decided to start investigating what his father was up to before he died, and he has a new villain to deal with, named Electro (Jamie Foxx).
What I liked:
- The relationship between Peter and Gwen. Garfield and Stone have great chemistry together (it doesn't hurt that they're dating in real life), and every time Spider-Man was on screen, I just wanted the movie to get back to focusing on Peter and Gwen. Director Mark Webb is very good at dealing with relationships onscreen. If you haven't seen 500 Days of Summer, you really need to.
- Electro was cool. I've always been a fan of characters who can shoot lightning (Raiden in Mortal Kombat, that guy in Big Trouble in Little China), and I liked the effect they used on his voice.
What I didn't like:
- Andrew Garfield is all wrong for Peter Parker. I really like him as an actor, but Peter shouldn't be so cocky and confident. The character works much better when he's insecure, shy, all the qualities that Tobey Maguire brought. Garfield seems like the coolest kid in school, so it isn't that exciting to see him become a super hero.
- I got tired of all his quips. It seemed like every time he was chasing bad guys, he had a bad one-liner. It was funny once or twice, but it started to get old really fast.
- Way too much exposition. I really didn't care what his dad was working on before he died, and when we find everything out, it doesn't seem to amount to much. We've already figured it out anyway. I also got tired of this: every time Peter was in his room, he'd look at his closet, and the camera would focus on his dad's briefcase. It happened several times. We got it the first time.
Overall, the movie isn't bad, but it feels very routine. I think there have been so many superhero movies lately that I'm sick of them. Unless they can bring something new, or give us an interesting character development, there's no reason to exist. It felt like I've seen this movie several times before.
I'll stick with Sam Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy (yes, even part 3).
In this new movie, Peter Parker (Garfield) can't decide what to do about Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone). He's in love with her, but he keep seeing the ghost of her dead father (Dennis Leary), who made him promise in the previous movie to stay away from Gwen. He tells her they can't be together, but then he stalks her and won't leave her alone. He's also decided to start investigating what his father was up to before he died, and he has a new villain to deal with, named Electro (Jamie Foxx).
What I liked:
- The relationship between Peter and Gwen. Garfield and Stone have great chemistry together (it doesn't hurt that they're dating in real life), and every time Spider-Man was on screen, I just wanted the movie to get back to focusing on Peter and Gwen. Director Mark Webb is very good at dealing with relationships onscreen. If you haven't seen 500 Days of Summer, you really need to.
- Electro was cool. I've always been a fan of characters who can shoot lightning (Raiden in Mortal Kombat, that guy in Big Trouble in Little China), and I liked the effect they used on his voice.
What I didn't like:
- Andrew Garfield is all wrong for Peter Parker. I really like him as an actor, but Peter shouldn't be so cocky and confident. The character works much better when he's insecure, shy, all the qualities that Tobey Maguire brought. Garfield seems like the coolest kid in school, so it isn't that exciting to see him become a super hero.
- I got tired of all his quips. It seemed like every time he was chasing bad guys, he had a bad one-liner. It was funny once or twice, but it started to get old really fast.
- Way too much exposition. I really didn't care what his dad was working on before he died, and when we find everything out, it doesn't seem to amount to much. We've already figured it out anyway. I also got tired of this: every time Peter was in his room, he'd look at his closet, and the camera would focus on his dad's briefcase. It happened several times. We got it the first time.
Overall, the movie isn't bad, but it feels very routine. I think there have been so many superhero movies lately that I'm sick of them. Unless they can bring something new, or give us an interesting character development, there's no reason to exist. It felt like I've seen this movie several times before.
I'll stick with Sam Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy (yes, even part 3).
Tuesday, April 29, 2014
Under the Skin - 3 stars
This movie is really interesting. Scarlett Johansson plays an alien who preys on young men in Scotland. She seems to have no emotions, but she is able to smile and flirt when trying to pick up her victims. She drives around in a van and asks men for directions. If she convinces them to get in her van, she takes them somewhere and they don't come back.
I know this sounds like Species, but it couldn't be more different. This is like Species if it was made by Stanley Kubrick. Director Jonathan Glazer (Sexy Beast, Birth) likes to shoot long, unnerving takes. The first five minutes of the movie seems to be an eyeball being formed while we listen to her trying to speak like a human for the first time.
There are some really cool, creepy sequences in this movie. I love the way she leads her victims to ... wherever it is they go. I'm not sure if what we're seeing is supposed to be literal, or just representative of what's happening to them, but it's fascinating to watch. I also love the sound design. Sometimes it's hard to tell whether you're hearing sound effects or musical score, but the sounds all help create this atmosphere that's very unique to this movie.
Some people will be bored watching it. It takes it's time, and there isn't a whole lot of dialogue for long stretches at a time. It isn't a traditional narrative, and the movie leaves you with a lot of questions. In the hands of a less talented director, that could be a problem. But the movie just works so well that none of that bothered me. It's been two weeks since I've seen it, and there are things I just can't get out of my head. I really need to see this again.
I know this sounds like Species, but it couldn't be more different. This is like Species if it was made by Stanley Kubrick. Director Jonathan Glazer (Sexy Beast, Birth) likes to shoot long, unnerving takes. The first five minutes of the movie seems to be an eyeball being formed while we listen to her trying to speak like a human for the first time.
There are some really cool, creepy sequences in this movie. I love the way she leads her victims to ... wherever it is they go. I'm not sure if what we're seeing is supposed to be literal, or just representative of what's happening to them, but it's fascinating to watch. I also love the sound design. Sometimes it's hard to tell whether you're hearing sound effects or musical score, but the sounds all help create this atmosphere that's very unique to this movie.
Some people will be bored watching it. It takes it's time, and there isn't a whole lot of dialogue for long stretches at a time. It isn't a traditional narrative, and the movie leaves you with a lot of questions. In the hands of a less talented director, that could be a problem. But the movie just works so well that none of that bothered me. It's been two weeks since I've seen it, and there are things I just can't get out of my head. I really need to see this again.
The Other Woman - 1 1/2 stars
Cameron Diaz is sleeping with this guy. One night, she surprises him at his house and discovers that he's married. His wife (Leslie Mann) is very upset when she learns that her husband is cheating on her, but she's not mad at Cameron Diaz. She understands that Diaz had no idea that he was married.
The two become good friends and eventually decide to get revenge on him. They follow him on a "business trip" and discover that he has another mistress (Kate Upton). They recruit her, and "hijinks" ensue.
How are they going to teach him a lesson, you ask? Well, how about putting hair removal cream in his shampoo, and putting a laxative in his wine while he's at a fancy restaurant. Hilarious! And you just know that Girls Just Want to Have Fun is going to play over a montage of them planning their schemes.
This movie just isn't very good. It's supposed to be a comedy, but I didn't laugh much. Leslie Mann made me chuckle now and then, but she had to work really hard for those laughs. Cameron Diaz bored me, but Kate Upton did okay.
The two become good friends and eventually decide to get revenge on him. They follow him on a "business trip" and discover that he has another mistress (Kate Upton). They recruit her, and "hijinks" ensue.
How are they going to teach him a lesson, you ask? Well, how about putting hair removal cream in his shampoo, and putting a laxative in his wine while he's at a fancy restaurant. Hilarious! And you just know that Girls Just Want to Have Fun is going to play over a montage of them planning their schemes.
This movie just isn't very good. It's supposed to be a comedy, but I didn't laugh much. Leslie Mann made me chuckle now and then, but she had to work really hard for those laughs. Cameron Diaz bored me, but Kate Upton did okay.
Brick Mansions - 2 stars
The late Paul Walker stars as Damien Collier, an undercover cop. Set in the near future, Brick Mansions is the most dangerous section of Detroit. It's become overrun with crime and the city has sectioned it off from the rest of the city in order to keep the good people of Detroit safe. Officer Collier is sent in to find and disarm a neutron bomb which could wipe out the entire city.
In his efforts, Collier teams up with Lino Dupree (David Belle). Lino's girlfriend is being held hostage by Tremaine Alexander (RZA), a crime lord who also happens to be the one in possession of the bomb.
The best thing about the movie is the action. David Belle is one of the founders of Parkour, and he's a lot of fun to watch. The opening 10 minutes of this movie are a great showcase of what Parkour is all about and it's great. He runs across buildings and climbs up walls like Spiderman. It's great stuff, but it does feel a little dated. It seems like Parkour was a big deal about 10 years ago. There was that great Parkour sequence in Casino Royale, and The Office did a bit about it as well.
Dated or not, it's still fun to watch. But all of Belle's dialogue is dubbed, and it's so bad it's distracting. His French accent must be pretty strong, and the filmmakers worried that the Fast & Furious fans wouldn't like it. Speaking of F&F, this feels a lot like those movies. Paul Walker is basically playing the same character, and once again he falls in with criminals who turn out to be pretty nice guys. By the end, they're all one big family. I was just waiting for the scene where they all have a barbecue together.
The movie doesn't suck, but it's nothing special. A little humor here and there, but not much. Good action, but filmed and edited in that shaky cam, close up fashion like every other action movie these days. I wish once in a while they would hold the camera still and film the action in a wide shot so that we can see the choreography play out.
Oh yeah, one more thing. You know how in movies like this, the bad guys can't hit anything? There can be 10 guys with machine guns firing at Paul Walker, and all he has to do is hunch over like he's trying to get out of the rain. I can deal with that. But at one point, there's a guy on a two-story roof with a sniper rifle, and he still can't hit Paul Walker. That's just ridiculous.
In his efforts, Collier teams up with Lino Dupree (David Belle). Lino's girlfriend is being held hostage by Tremaine Alexander (RZA), a crime lord who also happens to be the one in possession of the bomb.
The best thing about the movie is the action. David Belle is one of the founders of Parkour, and he's a lot of fun to watch. The opening 10 minutes of this movie are a great showcase of what Parkour is all about and it's great. He runs across buildings and climbs up walls like Spiderman. It's great stuff, but it does feel a little dated. It seems like Parkour was a big deal about 10 years ago. There was that great Parkour sequence in Casino Royale, and The Office did a bit about it as well.
Dated or not, it's still fun to watch. But all of Belle's dialogue is dubbed, and it's so bad it's distracting. His French accent must be pretty strong, and the filmmakers worried that the Fast & Furious fans wouldn't like it. Speaking of F&F, this feels a lot like those movies. Paul Walker is basically playing the same character, and once again he falls in with criminals who turn out to be pretty nice guys. By the end, they're all one big family. I was just waiting for the scene where they all have a barbecue together.
The movie doesn't suck, but it's nothing special. A little humor here and there, but not much. Good action, but filmed and edited in that shaky cam, close up fashion like every other action movie these days. I wish once in a while they would hold the camera still and film the action in a wide shot so that we can see the choreography play out.
Oh yeah, one more thing. You know how in movies like this, the bad guys can't hit anything? There can be 10 guys with machine guns firing at Paul Walker, and all he has to do is hunch over like he's trying to get out of the rain. I can deal with that. But at one point, there's a guy on a two-story roof with a sniper rifle, and he still can't hit Paul Walker. That's just ridiculous.
Transcendence - 1 1/2 stars
Dr. Will Caster (Johnny Depp) is a scientist working on artificial intelligence. He works with his wife Evelyn (Rebecca Hall) and friend Max (Paul Bettany). One day, he is shot and poisoned by luddite terrorists. When he realizes he has less than a month to live, he decides to upload his consciousness into his computer system. His wife supports this idea, but Max is skeptical.
Obviously it works, or we wouldn't have a movie. Once he's in the computer, he immediately wants to be connected to the internet. Max, being a rational scientists, thinks they should take their time. Evelyn, no longer rational, says "How dare you? Get out!" and immediately uploads her husband's consciousness onto the web.
Is it really him, or is it just his memory patterns? The movie doesn't really sweat these details. You would think that Evelyn would be so overjoyed to have her dead husband back that she would talk to him. You would think she would ask what it feels like. But no, she just turns into his willing servant, doing whatever she can to help him. That's probably my biggest complaint about this movie. No one has a conversation. Every line of dialogue is movie speak which only serves to further the plot. No characters are developed in any way.
There is a lot of potential to this premise, but the movie isn't smart enough to know what to do with it. Instead it just becomes a dumb action movie. Evelyn goes to a small town in the middle of nowhere and starts building some technological utopia. Using nanotechnology, the virtual Dr. Caster starts to heal the townspeople of whatever ails them, then turns them into super soldiers. Max is captured by the luddite terrorists, and eventually seems to join them (although that isn't really clear). Morgan Freeman is also in this movie. At first he is a researcher, but in the second half of the movie it seems like he has joined the FBI.
I have a lot of problems with this movie. I already mentioned the lack of normal, human conversations. Besides that, the movie jumps ahead two years without any good reason or explanation about what's been happening. The characters' motivations make no sense. I don't care how distraught Evelyn was when her husband dies, or how shocked he might be when he returns in virtual form. I just can't believe that she would go along with everything he says without any hesitation or questioning. Morgan Freeman and Cillian Murphy are totally wasted in this movie. And Johnny Depp looks as bored in this movie as I was watching it.
Obviously it works, or we wouldn't have a movie. Once he's in the computer, he immediately wants to be connected to the internet. Max, being a rational scientists, thinks they should take their time. Evelyn, no longer rational, says "How dare you? Get out!" and immediately uploads her husband's consciousness onto the web.
Is it really him, or is it just his memory patterns? The movie doesn't really sweat these details. You would think that Evelyn would be so overjoyed to have her dead husband back that she would talk to him. You would think she would ask what it feels like. But no, she just turns into his willing servant, doing whatever she can to help him. That's probably my biggest complaint about this movie. No one has a conversation. Every line of dialogue is movie speak which only serves to further the plot. No characters are developed in any way.
There is a lot of potential to this premise, but the movie isn't smart enough to know what to do with it. Instead it just becomes a dumb action movie. Evelyn goes to a small town in the middle of nowhere and starts building some technological utopia. Using nanotechnology, the virtual Dr. Caster starts to heal the townspeople of whatever ails them, then turns them into super soldiers. Max is captured by the luddite terrorists, and eventually seems to join them (although that isn't really clear). Morgan Freeman is also in this movie. At first he is a researcher, but in the second half of the movie it seems like he has joined the FBI.
I have a lot of problems with this movie. I already mentioned the lack of normal, human conversations. Besides that, the movie jumps ahead two years without any good reason or explanation about what's been happening. The characters' motivations make no sense. I don't care how distraught Evelyn was when her husband dies, or how shocked he might be when he returns in virtual form. I just can't believe that she would go along with everything he says without any hesitation or questioning. Morgan Freeman and Cillian Murphy are totally wasted in this movie. And Johnny Depp looks as bored in this movie as I was watching it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
